New, daily updating edition

   Headlines  |  Alternate Histories  |  International Edition


Home Page

Announcements 

Alternate Histories

International Edition

List of Updates

Want to join?

Join Writer Development Section

Writer Development Member Section

Join Club ChangerS

Editorial

Chris Comments

Book Reviews

Blog

Letters To The Editor

FAQ

Links Page

Terms and Conditions

Resources

Donations

Alternate Histories

International Edition

Alison Brooks

Fiction

Essays

Other Stuff

Authors

If Baseball Integrated Early

Counter-Factual.Net

Today in Alternate History

This Day in Alternate History Blog



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evil To Him Who Evil Thinks:
The 1974 London Uprising, Part 1
by Chris Oakley

  

At the time Ted Heath went to the country in 1974 to decide his government’s political future, there hadn’t been an armed revolt on Britain’s home soil since the ill-fated 1745 Jacobite insurgency by Charles Edward Stuart. The American Revolution of 1775, the Indian Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, and the so-called “Troubles” in Ulster during the late 1960s and early ‘70s had all transpired on distant shores; as a consequence the Territorial Army had gotten somewhat rusty when it came to quashing domestic insurrections. But they were shortly to get a crash course on that subject courtesy of a group of left-wing extremists who took their inspiration from radicals in the U.S. and Europe and, for a time, would have Britain perched on the brink of a civil war....

******

    The British Popular Liberation Front(BPLF) was, to say the least, an eclectic organization. Despite its militant-sounding name the BPLF hadn’t always been inclined towards violence; in fact, at the time it was first established in 1970 many other leftist organizations openly criticized it for being insufficiently committed to what Karl Marx had dubbed “the class struggle”. But just over two years into its existence the group’s ideological direction would begin to take a sharp turn in the direction of armed resistance to the established order of British society when one of its founders was fatally injured in a scuffle with Manchester police while resisting arrest for demonstrating without a permit. The official police report of the incident asserted, and most eyewitness accounts tended to agree, that the activist’s death had been an unfortunate instance of an overzealous officer losing control of his temper and exceeding the accepted bounds of the use of physical force.

    But his comrades in the BPLF were convinced his death had been a government-orchestrated assassination. Determining that force had to be met with force, they held a secret meeting at an abandoned farm in Kent in October of 1972 at which the group’s executive committee voted unanimously to adopt more militant tactics in their quest to institute a socialist government in Britain; they also took the pledge to avenge their comrade’s death at any cost. It was this pledge it particular, in the eyes of most British historians today, which first set the BPLF on the road to its ultimate demise and the uprising that turned London into a war zone throughout much of January and February of 1974....

******

     In hindsight, the real surprise is not that the BPLF attempted to overthrow the British government but that it waited until rather late in the day to do so. As early as 1971 some of the more hardcore members of the group had been agitating for an insurrection to topple the Heath government and institute the BPLF’s version of a socialist regime. But the group’s principal leaders felt that acting too hastily would cause Scotland Yard to crack down on the group so hard it would be seriously weakened or even fall apart altogether. The Manchester incident and the October 1972 Kent meeting would change all that, pushing the organization irrevocably towards insurrection; throughout 1973, in an operation whose scope and effectiveness would astonish police investigators when it was finally exposed, the BPLF secretly stockpiled an arsenal right under the noses of not only Scotland Yard but also the internal security agency MI- 5.

   The Heath government, stretched between the twin difficulties of trying to save its own political future and keep a lid on the civil unrest in Northern Ireland, had little time and even less resources left over to do the kind of intelligence gathering necessary to get a full picture of the BPLF’s plans. Few of Heath’s security advisors were even aware of the insurrection plot’s existence until ten days before it was due to be launched-- and even then, they had to learn about it from London’s Fleet Street tabloids. News Of The World, in a rare departure from its customary diet of celebrity scandals and men in power behaving badly, published an anonymous letter from a source close to the BPLF warning that “a day of reckoning” was about to come for 10 Downing Street and claiming “the oppressed masses” were about to rise up “to smash the edifice of Tory neo-fascism into rubble”.

******

    Like many urban insurrections which had happened before Heath’s tenure as prime minister of Britain and many others that have happened since Heath left office, the 1974 London revolt made extensive use of homemade weapons. One of the principal figures of the BPLF’s conspiracy to overthrow Heath was a former Oxford chemistry student who used his science background to show his comrades how to turn the most everyday household cleaning products into lethal explosives and make devastating bombs out of ordinary kitchen appliances. When British army and police authorities finally ran him to ground, they would discover he had been personally responsible for no less than three dozen bomb attacks against metropolitan London, including an abortive attempt to blow up the prime minister’s 10 Downing Street residence.

    On January 19th, 1974 the BPLF held another secret conference, this time at the Soho flat of the group’s leader; at this meeting the group’s members voted unanimously to begin their planned uprising within seventy- two hours. Among the targets for their initial attacks: Buckingham Palace, the National Gallery, the Ministry of Defence, and the Bank of England. If all went according to plan, London would be thrown into total chaos within hours of the BPLF’s first strikes on the city. Shortly before the attacks, the group’s propaganda wing would phone various press bureaus to issue(in the words of the BPLF propaganda chief) “a declaration of people’s war” on the Heath government-- a gesture intended as much to drive home the group’s commitment to making revolution as it was to garner the maximum amount of possible publicity for the revolutionaries’ cause.     The next day those BPLF members entrusted with the task of carrying out the first series of attacks in London began surreptitiously moving themselves and their weapons into position in order to be in the closest possible proximity to their targets when the signal was given to attack. One of those targets, as it happened, was the United States embassy in London, where the main topic of conversation among the staff at the time was the mushrooming Watergate scandal back in Washington. Few people at the embassy even suspected that anything out of the ordinary was going on beyond the embassy gates, much less that the building was under imminent threat of attack. But one of those people was the embassy’s director of security, and since the News Of The World published the “day of reckoning” letter he’d been trying to get the White House’s consent to put his Marine guard detail on full alert; to the security director’s frustration, though, Nixon was too distracted by Watergate to even telephone him.

    On the evening of January 21st the general secretary of the BPLF, who at that time was known to the public only by the code-name “Claudius”, had a brief two-word dispatch sent to all BPLF branch leaders throughout the London area. The message said simply: IT’S ON. There was no turning back now for either side in the war that was about to erupt on the streets of the British capital. The only question was who the first casualties would be in that war.

******

     The clock had just struck 5:00 AM in London on the morning of January 22nd when the first explosions rumbled through the air near the Covent Garden Market. Almost simultaneously, machine gun fire was heard outside the offices of the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign Secretary; less than five minutes after the first explosion at Covent Garden Scotland Yard started receiving frantic phone calls that the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s office was under attack. Back at No. 10 Downing Street, Prime Minister Heath was awoken by a senior MI-5 aide with the shocking news that the BPLF had announced this was the start of its rebellion against his government. Heath immediately sprang into action, ordering three Territorial Army battalions deployed to London to crush the uprising while it was still in its opening stages.

      Much to the dismay of the BPLF guerrillas, their attempt to break into Buckingham Palace and seize the royal family proved an absolute failure. The palace guards, despite initially being caught by surprise, acted with great heroism and professionalism in their defense of the royals; their actions bought the royal family crucial time to evacuate to safety and gave the British Army an opportunity to dispatch elements of the SAS to the palace to provide the guards with additional tactical support against the insurgents. By the time the smoke cleared four guards, six BPLF fighters, and three SAS men lay dead on the palace grounds; the remaining insurgents, deciding discretion was the better part of valor, retreated as quickly as they could to await another opportunity to attack the palace-- an opportunity they’d never get.

      Things went noticeably better for the BPLF guerrillas in their raid on the National Gallery. The museum was virtually deserted at that time of the morning, enabling the insurgents to seize it with barely a single shot fired. When the battle plan for the uprising had first been devised the insurgents had intended to simply lay waste to the building, but as the strategy for their revolt evolved it occurred to the BPLF’s leadership the museum might serve as a valuable bargaining chip to force the Heath government to negotiate a resolution to the showdown on terms that favored the militants. So they placed a rather sizable bomb in the heart of the gallery and threatened to reduce the building to rubble if the Heath government did not meet the BPLF’s demands in full and quickly.

      It was in the effort to avert the National Gallery’s destruction that the SAS would make its second major contribution to the defense of the British government in the London uprising...

comments powered by Disqus

 

TO BE CONTINUED

Sitemetre

Site Meter