Updated Sunday 15 May, 2011 12:18 PM

   Headlines  |  Alternate Histories  |  International Edition


Home Page

Announcements 

Alternate Histories

International Edition

List of Updates

Want to join?

Join Writer Development Section

Writer Development Member Section

Join Club ChangerS

Editorial

Chris Comments

Book Reviews

Blog

Letters To The Editor

FAQ

Links Page

Terms and Conditions

Resources

Donations

Alternate Histories

International Edition

Alison Brooks

Fiction

Essays

Other Stuff

Authors

If Baseball Integrated Early

Counter-Factual.Net

Today in Alternate History

This Day in Alternate History Blog



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weapons of Choice – John Birmingham

I confess that I picked up this book with a feeling of trepidation; the theme is one that’s very hard to pull off successfully, even with the best of writers.  However, I was wrong and my first impression was that the traditional ‘The Final Countdown’ plot had finally found the author it deserved.

A multinational battle force from 2020 gets swept back in time and encounters a WW2 battle fleet.  After a short confrontation, the two fleets make an alliance against the Japanese.  But what effects will the time travellers have on their new allies? 

Birmingham avoids the clinch of love and joy forever more and has the newcomers disgusted by the racial and sexual attitudes of the Americans from 1942.  The Clinton group reflects a multicultural society that finds the racist and sexist attitudes of 1942 America almost as repugnant as those of the Axis powers, while the mere thought of non-whites and women not just serving in uniform but holding command drives many Allied officers and civilian officials apoplectic.  There are humorous scenes; the British admiralty is shocked at the news of Pound’s impending death and they demand that the UK ships in the fleet come to Britain at once.

The book suffers, however, with an unashamedly liberal agenda.  Saying that Hillary Clinton was "the greatest President for the Navy since Reagan" is simply unbelievable.  The author is too concerned with political correctness at times, damaging his credibility.  It also does not fit in with the era – if the US had been fighting terrorists for twenty years, I’d expect a harsher attitude.  A lost city does not mean peace and brotherly feelings towards all men, it means the opposite.  The advanced tech of the newcomers is too advanced for us to understand or fit in context – why not use a modern-day fleet instead?

The ending is a cliffhanger – what is it these days with long series of books? – which offers more fun for the future.  Weapons of Choice is a good read; buy it and enjoy it.

Hit Counter