Updated Sunday 15 May, 2011 12:18 PM

   Headlines  |  Alternate Histories  |  International Edition


Home Page

Announcements 

Alternate Histories

International Edition

List of Updates

Want to join?

Join Writer Development Section

Writer Development Member Section

Join Club ChangerS

Editorial

Chris Comments

Book Reviews

Blog

Letters To The Editor

FAQ

Links Page

Terms and Conditions

Resources

Donations

Alternate Histories

International Edition

Alison Brooks

Fiction

Essays

Other Stuff

Authors

If Baseball Integrated Early

Counter-Factual.Net

Today in Alternate History

This Day in Alternate History Blog



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE UNIVERSE OF 2005 COMPARED TO THE UNIVERSE OF OUR COLLEGE DAYS

Luncheon Address, Class of 1960 45th Reunion, June 4, 2005

Thomas Wm. HAMILTON '60

I want to begin not with September 1956, when we first entered Morningside Heights as Columbia freshmen, but a bit over a year earlier, July 28, 1955, almost exactly a half century ago. 

That was the date on which former Columbia University President Eisenhower called a press conference to announce plans for America to launch a small satellite known as Vanguard. 

This drew the headline in the New York Post, a newspaper founded by another Columbian, and known even fifty years ago for its restrained good taste, of a single word on the front page:  "SPACESHIPS!’  This event largely determined my later career.  I had intended to go into astronomy almost from the first grade, but the creation of  a space program opened up jobs to a magnificent extent.

When we entered Columbia a year later, astronomy was one of the long-established sciences offered as an elective.  The textbook being used makes an interesting contrast to the textbooks used today.  Our astronomy text in 1956 was the fifth edition of a book written by Fath, an astronomer best remembered today for having a small lunar crater named for him.  The book cost $2.75 in the CU bookstore new.  I saved fifty cents by getting a used copy--had to save some money after buying all those Humanities and CC books.

Fath's Elements of Astronomy had fewer than two hundred pages which well represented the state of astronomy in those days.  All illustrations were in black and white.  A large amount of space was devoted to such things as determining the Hour Angle of the Mean Sun.  Three planets had no moons, Saturn had nine, and was the only planet with rings.  The hot news was that someone--unnamed--may have figured out how the Sun and other stars made their energy. 

Within a few years Subramanyan Chandrasekhar of the University of Wisconsin would be the first astronomer awarded a Nobel Prize in Physics for this work.

Let's contrast Fath with a typical astronomy text being used today.  The latest revised edition of Dixon's Dynamic Astronomy, the text book I have favoured for most of my introductory classes through the years, runs over four hundred pages, has dozens of colour photos, many shot either on location or from Earth orbit, and barely mentions the Mean Sun.  Making up for that unlamented lack are many topics unknown to Fath, such as black holes, brown dwarfs, pulsars, quasars, and even details of lunar geology, such as the anorthosite of the lunar highlands.  Saturn now has 46 moons, and is just one of four planets with rings.  Only two planets lack a moon. 

The equations for how the Sun and similar stars make energy are spelled out, as are details on the methods used by some types of dissimilar stars.  The clouds of Venus are no longer water, but sulphuric acid.  And details of satellites and orbits are major topics.  Of course, modern textbooks do cost a bit more--about $70 new.

How did all this come about?  Part comes from new telescopes.  Even as we were starting at Columbia plans were being laid for the great complex of telescopes at Kitt Peak in Arizona.  Mauna Kea in Hawaii, Purple Mountain Observatory in China, and others in places such as Armenia and Chile came later.  All these telescopes and the hordes of smaller ones benefited from advances in computer technology and the replacement of simple photographic techniques with more advanced electronic gadgetry.  But the most important single change is due to something that occurred in our sophomore year.

I well remember the astronomy class meeting of October 9, 1957.  The course met on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and this was the first class meeting since the USSR--a nation which no longer exists--had sent Sputnik 1 into space.  Our instructor was Professor Jan Schilt.  Prof. Schilt was of Dutch origin, and in the Netherlands had been a student of the famous astronomer Jacobus Cornelius Kapteyn (1851-1922).  If one traces Kapteyn's predecessors, the trail leads back directly to Johannes Kepler, although Prof. Schilt never mentioned to his classes, and few students were aware, that they were joining such a distinguished educational dynasty.

Prof. Schilt entered the lecture hall in Pupin with a big grin, and started with, "Well gentlemen, it is not often that we have something new in the sky to talk about."  That is not a phrase any astronomer could start a class with today, when new planets are found literally on a monthly basis, Jupiter alone has 63 moons--more than twice the number known for the entire Solar System in 1957, and one of the political issues of our day is the President's plan for manned missions to Mars.  Not all the changes are due to the space program.  Pulsars are an accidental discovery of radio astronomy, a field which I was advised to avoid because it was nothing but a passing fad of no value.  Today some of the largest and most expensive astronomical facilities on Earth are radio telescopes, particularly ones such as the Very Large Array, which can trace exceptionally fine features in distant nebulas and galaxies.

Even the size of the universe has been adjusted since our college days.  Then the Andromeda Galaxy was believed to be a bit smaller than our own galaxy, and about 700,000 light-years away.  Today we know it is 2.2 million light-years away, and distinctly larger than our own galaxy, just another step along the humiliating route that Copernicus started us on when he moved Earth away from the centre of the universe.  We also know that Andromeda and our galaxy are just the two largest of a cluster of about three dozen galaxies, three-quarters of which were quite unknown in our college days.

Closer to home, having two Rovers wandering around Mars for the past year is a long way from arguing about the existence of canals on Mars--which Fath, to his credit, doubted.  The discovery by the Huyghens probe this past January of rivers, lakes and seas on Saturn's largest moon was a bit of a surprise to us.  Back in the Fifties it would have been a real shocker.

Today we know a great deal about the processes by which planets form.  And I cannot resist a personal note.  While I was working on the Apollo Project in 1964 for Grumman Aircraft, the company looked ahead to the days when the Apollo missions to the Moon were complete.  They sent around a memo asking for suggestions on non-lunar missions for Apollo. 

The 1974 joint Apollo-Soyuz flight grew out of this.  But I suggested using an Apollo, complete with lunar lander, to fly to one of the asteroids which pass near the Earth.  I buttressed this with the results of some time borrowed from the IBM 7094 computer Grumman used.  I was able to show that at least two of the eight asteroids known to pass reasonably near the Earth were within feasible range.

Grumman was enthused enough about this to pass the idea along to NASA.  Unfortunately, NASA decided that fuel, time, and the equipment's dependability were too marginal to try. 

However, when President Bush appointed a panel to make recommendations on the future of America's space program last year, I proposed reviving this plan.  Today over 700 asteroids are known to approach the Earth close enough to reach, an average of one every six weeks or so. 

At least two of the nine members of the commission indicated strong support for the idea, which now is being considered as a step to be taken between building a permanent lunar base and a manned expedition to Mars.

All of this has been rather impressionistic, so I think that as a scientist I should bring this to a conclusion with something quantitative.  The Hubble Constant, the rate at which the universe expands, was remarkably inconstant for decades, fluctuating from as low as 30 kilometres per second to as much as 140 kilometres per second.  The correct value is important because it relates to the age of the universe.  Today the Hubble Constant is known, partially thanks to the Hubble telescope, as being 72 kilometres per second.  And so I can conclude by saying exactly how the universe has changed in the 45 years since we graduated:  it has expanded by exactly 106,215,990,000 kilometres.

Hit Counter