| 
 | 
| 
 
               Join Writer Development Section Writer Development Member Section 
 
 
 This Day in Alternate History Blog 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | THE SUN DID NOT SET IN 1815….                           To Great Britain, the War of I8I2 was only a bothersome addition of its greaterstruggle against Napoleonic France. To the Canadians it was clearly a case ofAmerican aggression. But to the Americans it was neither simple nor clear. TheUnited States entered the war with confused ambitions and divided loyalties, andmade peace without settling any of the issues that had induced the nation to goto war. The War of 1812 is one of the forgotten wars of the United States. The warlasted for only three years, and while it ended much like it started; instalemate; it was in fact a war that once and for all confirmed AmericanIndependence.  The war itself, sparked national pride, and the American industryprospered because it made more goods at home when trade stopped with Britain.Also, the British recognized U.S. boundaries and stayed out of the NorthwestTerritory. President Madison’s war message to Congress, did after all, make astrong case for the need to fight with Britain for Neutral Rights, when the U.S.merchant vessels became a prey to the Royal Navy warships.                 The US was broke after its misadventures in the Canadas and on the seas – andBritain had lost its opportunities, it was time to end the squabble and embracethe status quo, the rest was little more than posturing for the Peace Table.During the peace talks, the British presented the American diplomats with manydemands, but the U.S. refused to comply. After a few months, the Treaty of Ghentwas signed and it included none of Britain’s original demands of the Americans.It ended the fighting and restored the status quo antebellum (the state ofthings before the war). Neither country gained territory and many matters wereleft unresolved, such as the freedom of seas issue and neutrality rights.               The offensive actions of the United States failed in every attemptto capture Canada. On the other hand, the British army was successfully stoppedin it attempts to capture Baltimore, New York, and New Orleans. There were anumber of American naval victories in which American vessels proved themselvessuperior to similar sized British vessels.  When we look at world history, the war that broke out in North America in 1812was greatly overshadowed by the war between France and Britain in Europe.America’s involvement in the War of 1812 was confusing to many people living in1812 and is still confusing to many people today. So to look at this prospectivecould gives some understanding how such a war that had “little impact”, mighthave changed history, as we know it. Our story comes at the Battle of New Orleans. This event, when I first read it,seemed quite interesting. This came from a what-if question, what would happen,if on January 8, the British had defeated a small American force, with theintention of seizing New Orleans, the crown of the South?   In late 1814, New Orleans was home to a population of French, Spanish, African,Anglo and Creole peoples dedicated to pursuing economic opportunism and the joysof life. It also occupied a strategic place on the map. Located just 100 milesupstream from the mouth of the Mississippi River, the City offered a temptingprize to a British military still confident over the burning of Washington, D.C.in 1814. To capture the city, Admiral Sir Alexander Cochrane of the British Navyplanned out a naval fleet of more than 50 ships to transport 10,000 troops fromJamaica, - a large number of them experienced veterans from the Wellington’scampaign in Europe. Sir Edward Pakenham, the 37-year-old brother-in-law of theDuke of Wellington and a decorated general, would lead them.         On Christmas Day, Pakenham arrived at the mouth of the Mississippi to find histroops disposed on a narrow isthmus below New Orleans between the MississippiRiver and the river swamp. They had landed two weeks earlier, while Jackson’s5000 defenders consisting of regular soldiers, militia, Indians, black troopsand even pirates, began constructing strong defensive earthworks of logs andcotton bales. Their position had a clear field of fire across the ground theBritish had to advance over. Pekenham had 7500 men under his command. While asolid and brave second-in-command, any military logic must have left Pakenhambefore the battle, as his plan of attack for a frontal attack was unimaginativeand deadly. The fog that was supposed to help the British in their advance was creating moreproblems than anticipated. It was thick enough to create problems for theartillery units, who are having trouble finding their positions and setting up.As the artillery opened up to signal the advance, British regiments on oppositeends of the field headed out to capture and silence the gun batteries in frontof the American lines.  Suddenly, the fog began to lift. As the morning mist disappears, and Pekenhamloses his element of surprise, and Andrew Jackson has a clear view of the enemyarmy that has plagued him for weeks. The artillery from Jackson’s line and theships on the river commence a relentless fire on the redcoats. The exposedBritish are helpless since they are too far away to respond with their muskets.Advancing, the British were hit with an overpowering rain of cannon and musketfire but continued their attack.Taking charge of the crucial attack in person, Pakenham was wounded in the knee,and then, as he tried to remount his horse, was hit in the arm. Seconds latercame a mortal wound. Later, the British retreated, crossing the river and seeingtheir glimpse at the carnage on the battlefield.  After having withdrawn fromthe battlefield, for ten days the shattered remnants of Pakenham’s army remainedin camp, then re-embarked and sailed away. New Orleans was an unfortunate tragedy for the British as it was an unnecessarybattle. Peace with America had been signed with the Treaty of Ghent on ChristmasEve, but the combatants did not learn of it until after the clash. In twofateful hours, more than 2000 British troops - including two senior generals -had been killed, wounded or captured. Jackson lost eight killed and 13 injured.Unaware that a peace treaty had been signed, the two sides continued fighting inLouisiana. Led by General Andrew Jackson, the Americans scored the greatestvictory of the war. General Andrew Jackson's leadership at New Orleans changedeverything. The battle with British on January 8, 1815, is among the mostdecisive American military victories in our history. It was because of thisspectacular victory, Congress ratified the Treaty of Ghent ending the War. But what if the uninformed British had defeated the American force. There wereat several times, instances were the battle could have easily been lost to theAmericans. After the British established their base at Pine Island on LakeBorgne in December of 1814, Lt. Col. William Thornton of the 85th regiment, ledpart of the advance forces that moved up the Bayou Bienvenu to the VillerePlantation when the British first arrived in New Orleans. Thornton urged hissenior commander, John Keane, to move on New Orleans, while the Americans werestill unaware of their proximity to the city. Keane decided to wait for SirEdward Pakenham’s reinforcements instead. This decision cost the British theirbest chance for capturing New Orleans, but it wasn’t their only. Another, and the most noticeable example occurred at the west bank of the city.While amidst the devastation, the battle on the west bank had yet suddenlybecome critical. Jackson did not make adequate preparations to meet the advancethere until the British began their movement, and by then it was too late. Theheavy guns of a battery posted on the west bank were not placed to fire alongthat side of the river and only about 800 militiamen, divided in two groups amile apart, were in position to oppose the British forces there. The British,under Thornton, pressed on, routed them, and overran the battery. Their rout wasonly called off when Pakenham's successor in command, appalled by the deadlynumbers of the main assault, ordered his forces to withdraw from the west bankand rejoin the main force. Had the British continued their advance, Jackson’sposition would have been critical to the outcome of the battle.  Suppose Pekenham hadn’t been killed by his mortal wound, and had been able totake to the field without having Thornton’s troops being forced to withdraw.Although his plan seemed outrageous, he had the experience, unlike hissuccessor, to take advantage of Thornton’s breakthrough.  Jackson may as wellhave found himself outflanked by the redcoats, and forced to retreat.Subsequently, the British would have gained a victory, but a ruinous victorywith many casualties. At a heavy cost, the British have found themselves incontrol of the Southern Crown, which was New Orleans. If they captured New Orleans, what would the British have done? Would they havechosen to give New Orleans back, and walk away from the key to North America, orwould they have fully capitalized on it? The British were active in North America diplomatically. But truthfully, it’shard to see any real desire for imperial recovery or expansion in North Americain British actions during the period after the Revolution. Some can agree, thateverything the British did after that was largely defensive, in that it had todo with supporting and defending Canada or propping up the Spanish. I think theBritish wanted trade supremacy, not expanded territory.  Though with that said, possession of New Orleans would have been incrediblytempting. New Orleans was the navel of the American interior. They could haveused possession of it, at the very least, to extract concessions on Canadianfishing rights, drawing a favorable border between Maine and New Brunswick, etc.Or, it might have reawakened the desire to control the interior of NorthAmerica, linking it with the Oregon territory and Canada and keeping the U.S.pinned up in the East with two-thirds of its territory draining into theMississippi, whose outlet the British could control. For the United States this would have been an unstable situation, which wouldhave presented several problems. New Orleans was the only strong Americanpresence in a region, and at the time, was essentially cut off from the rest ofthe country by the effective British naval blockade. It was the only Americannaval station on the Gulf Coast and was geographically cut off from the rest ofthe country by Spain’s territories. Since acquiring Louisiana, the US had madeno secret of its desire to acquire these lands, but to the British, it wouldhave given them entire control of the shoreline from the Gulf right up to theAtlantic seaboard. Moreover, New Orleans was overflowing with millions ofdollars worth of tradable goods, including cotton, sugar, tobacco, ext. If theBritish took the city, a considerable portion of this prize would be theirs.  Many British commanders were also convinced that the mixed population of Indian,Spanish, French and black slaves would be eager to escape American domination.Admiral Cochrane wrote to Earl Bathurst of England, saying that he believed thatthe majority of the inhabitants (of Louisiana) preferred being under the BritishGovernment and next to that the Spanish. Nevertheless, the priority would thenwould have been Europe not Louisiana, regardless of the original plan! It ispossible then that the British may have given Louisiana to Spain (Britain’s allyduring the Peninsula Wars who already held the Floridas, but their influence wasrapidly fading in the face of American expansion). Many where also convinced in England, that possession of New Orleans would throwa wrench in America’s plans to expand their borders, and could cripple theiralready shaky economy. The economic livelihood of Great Britain was dominationin maritime trade and the US was expanding and catching up fast. Worse it wasanti-British! As an economic and trade rival the US, if it continued to grow atan almost exponential rate, it would eclipse Great Britain within a few years.Remembering of course, Napoleon's intimate connection with Louisiana, the US andGreat Britain could arguably be taken seriously on such an issue New Orleans.From the British side, if Pakenham won at New Orleans they would probably havesought to limit and contain the US as a future trading competitor not ‘conquer’it though. Of course had the British won at New Orleans the war must surely have gone on.If the U.S. was prepared in the early 1800s to go to war over New Orleans, thensurely they would have done so again especially if the British held it. Had theBritish taken New Orleans, the Treaty of Ghent would have been a DOA, dead onits arrival in North America. Congress would never have ratified it unless theBritish specifically clarified that they were willing to withdraw fromLouisiana. There is no way that the Southern and Western states would have giventhe approval for ending the war without reclaiming New Orleans. The northeasternstates might have insisted on ending the war without getting New Orleans back,and the stubborn New England states would have automatically gone against thedemands of their hated southerners.  So now that war has continued, what happens now? Although it favored to behumiliating at one point, the war at least taught the Americans several lessons.The Americans were proud of their reputation as the world’s best riflemen,however, the rifle played only a minor role in the war. On the other hand, theAmerican soldier displayed unexpected superiority in gunnery and engineering.Artillery contributed to American successes at the battle of Chippewa, thedefense of Sackett’s Harbor and Norfolk, the siege of Fort Erie, and NewOrleans. The war also boosted the reputation of the Corps of Engineers, a branchthat owed its efficiency chiefly to the West Point Military Academy. Academygraduates completed the fortifications at Fort Erie, built Fort Meigs, plannedthe harbor defenses of Norfolk and New York, and directed the fortifications atPlattsburg. If larger numbers of infantrymen had been trained, as well asartillerymen and engineers, the course of the war would have been entirelydifferent. But no invasion plan could be carried out, unless the political crisis was notto be resolved. Madison’s government is suffering from bankruptcy. To restartwar would be disastrous, especially when Britain is capable of sending moreskilled men to the continent, while Napoleon remains defeated. Five Americandiplomats, all negotiators of the unsuccessful Treaty of Ghent, traveled toLondon in order to work out a compromise. The five American peace commissionersincluded representatives from different political parties of different parts ofthe U.S. They were: Henry Clay, the prominent war-hawk who had helped triggerthe war; John Quincy Adams, a experienced envoy and diplomat; Albert Gallatin, aelegant Swiss-born former cabinet member; Jonathan Russell, ambassador toSweden, and James Ashton Bayard, a Delaware senator.  Will their diplomacy besuccessful, or will both the British and Americans prove unable to prevent therenewal of war. What do thing looks like at this point… We arrive in New Orleans, 1815. After the British occupation is installed, thelife doesn’t look particularly difficult for the British there. The Britishseemed to enjoy themselves and settled down to a lifestyle not markedlydifferent from that they lived in the hill-stations of Spain. The city is quietand it was not long before General Pekenham and most of the army would return toEngland. For a while, things seem to go quite well. Some disgruntled residentleaders are bribed with gold, others jailed by punitive suspicions. They arrangerace meetings, play polo, enjoy amateur plays, and play cricket, a commontradition in England’s sporting life. Food is plentiful and the Caribbeanmerchants are eager to do business with their new visitors.  So confident is Pekenham that he sends the government his celebrated message inwhich he declared that all was quiet 'from the shores of New Orleans to thebayous of the Mississippi’.  After Sir George Provost’s court martial and death,Pekenham was searing for the post of Governor-General of Canada, one of the topthree positions in British North America, and perhaps his eagerness to leave NewOrleans clouded his judgment. Others were more discerning. General John Keaneand other officers saw the rising tide of discontent. In New Orleans there was aserious cause for alarm. Prices had risen with the arrival of so many well-paidred-coated consumers.  Greedy merchants had foolishly raised taxes to pay for alifestyle many southerners felt unnecessary and inappropriate. Men were highlyvocal in their whispered claims of outrage and welcomes overstayed. Thebitterness of these men would stir up the fires of New Orleans discontent andhelp lead to disaster.  Not only did Keane see discontent among the Natives, but of his own soldiers.Keane inspected the British Army after occupation, only to see disgruntlementand unhappiness. His men had been exhausted and worn out from constant overseasservice. They were unfit for active service and he constantly expressed hisdisapproval of them very publicly and, in particular, with their officers.Between the 20th December 1815 and 7th Jan 1815 both regiments suffered fromdesertions and even had officers placed under open arrest.  They had been in service for so long, some up to 15 years without seeing homefor a rest that they were simply exhausted. Pakenham, forcing every officer onactive duty, gave them a critical task, which was their old reputation, one theworn out men could not longer give up to anymore. The men were simply were tooexhausted and demoralized to fight anymore now that Napoleon was gone, the US“beaten” and they wanted to go home! Meanwhile, Jackson, defeated, not captured, and his small rag-tag army are nowseeking refuge in the swampy southern wilderness. Most of his army, residents ofNew Orleans, had abandoned him. Although a few 800-1,000 admiring men remainwith the charismatic and able commander, everyday he risks losing men todesertions and constant raids.  He must take actions his men have long waited,which was to liberate the city. Continued attacks on the Georgia frontier byCreek Indians and runaway slaves based in Florida led Jackson to contemplate totake action against the remnant of the defeated Creek Indians, in fears thatthey might re-join their former allies to the British.  A couple of weeks after the take New Orleans, they British appear in Mobile onFebruary 8, confirming Jackson's fear for a planned an attack in that area. Theyoverwhelmed Fort Bowyer, a garrison manned by only 600 Regulars at the entranceto Mobile Harbor (in actual timeline, only 360 men guarded it, a little morepressure on Jackson would add more numbers). Before they could attack the cityitself, word arrived that a treaty had been signed at Ghent on Christmas Eve,two weeks before the Battle of New Orleans. The officers do not know what theyshould do. Should they withdraw now that a treaty has been signed, or stay, incase war will restart? The British officers rightly decide to halt their advancewhile awaiting approval from their superiors. (In OTL, they withdraw, becausethe treaty was not only signed, but also ratified by both countries).               Elsewhere, things are getting heated up. As soon as President Madison alerts themilitary of a possible renewal of war in February 1815, Congress, forced to meetat Blodgett's Hotel after the Capitol laid in blackened ruins, acted promptly toresolve the crisis over New Orleans. In Congress, there are many factions whoexpress different beliefs for a continued war. The most prominent of thesehotheads are John C. Calhoun. Leading the Southern-Western factions of bothhouses, he calls on an immediate renewal of war, if the British are to get anyconcessions from New Orleans.  Others, like Langdon Cheves of South Carolina, and Felix Grundy of Tennessee,have gone so far as to send aid and militia to Jackson, still waging a mini-waragainst the British.  Moderates, like John Rudolph, made a coalition of partiesand men, merchants, and all men of the Federalist faction vigorously opposedrenewing war (in OTL, the Federalists were largely dead by now, after the newsof the Treaty of Ghent ending the war, and news of the Jackson victory. Thoughwith that said, the war still seems uncertain in this TL).  In London, things also look bad. When Clay and others come to England, they wereprepared to allow the British free shipping rights on the Mississippi river.However, he is enraged to find the British looking for concessions in otherplaces were they’ve already been defeated. The British diplomats present a listof perverse demands, which had violated their former written treaty. First, theywanted to acquire the land within the former Louisiana Territory that lied northof the Platte River. Second, they wanted free navigational rights on theMississippi, which included unhindered access to New Orleans. Third, they wantedto establish an Indian Protectorate, where the Indians themselves had alreadybeen defeated. Fourth, they wanted to construct warships and build a series offorts on the Great Lakes. And fifth, they wanted a stricter border between Mainand New Brunswick. Henry Clay and others are in an intense dispute with British diplomats of thePrince Regent. Clay was willing to allow the British passage into New Orleans,but to have major accessions elsewhere seemed ludicrous. When news of theprovisions of the treaty reaches America there is uproar from Congress. News ofthe unsuccessful negotiating sparks more calls for renewing war. Many fromLondon do not want to re-enter the war during their recovery after facingNapoleon. But the arrogance and the ambitions and interest of high-level men ofthe Prince Regent cause tortuous compromise between their Yankee counterparts.  As the American and British diplomat continue their rising dispute, the Britishtroops coming to Canada have problems of their own. While traveling enroute toCanada, an envoy fleet of 3,000 men becomes entangled in a heavy trans-Atlanticfog and becomes separated. While most of the ships made it to the Naval stationof Halifax safely, three ships were delayed. Two coming to a clearing in theFog, found themselves face to face with an American privateering ship. Aworrisome moment, but they were at peace, weren't they? (Of course one was neversure back then. In those days, word was passed by ship, and sometimes one wouldnot know the most current news for months). The American ship comes broadside tothe British vessel. The British commander, who was aware of the negotiations inLondon, cried out to the American captain, “Are we at Peace, or War?” Thecaptain replied “War!”, and a short exchange began when the guns of the Americanship spitted fire through the side of the British vessel. Almost all hands onthat ship were lost. Clearly the peace was little more than a figment of one'simagination.  Angered by this attack, King George demanded that the peace talks be ended, andwithdrew his entire staff of negotiators from the peace table. Although theTreaty was signed, it was not ratified. The war had officially continued, andsomething was definitely in the making. Madison know that this senseless war, which after several attempt to end, wasabout the continue, and its sun rising. However, in sharp contrast, the Americanmilitary machine would prove itself superbly ready and well tested after severalyears of defeat and victory. Congress called on an army of 50,000 recruits. Manywere taken by the outcries of the war-hawks, claiming to resolve the deaths ofthousands who had were about to die for nothing. Within days of mobilization,starting on January 23, Madison and his press wielding war-hawks were able tofield a unheard of 14,300 men, compared to the 5,000 who had signed up in 1812.War seemed approaching the corner, and the armies of the United States andBritain are to again clash…   
 |