New, daily updating edition

   Headlines  |  Alternate Histories  |  International Edition


Home Page

Announcements 

Alternate Histories

International Edition

List of Updates

Want to join?

Join Writer Development Section

Writer Development Member Section

Join Club ChangerS

Editorial

Chris Comments

Book Reviews

Blog

Letters To The Editor

FAQ

Links Page

Terms and Conditions

Resources

Donations

Alternate Histories

International Edition

Alison Brooks

Fiction

Essays

Other Stuff

Authors

If Baseball Integrated Early

Counter-Factual.Net

Today in Alternate History

This Day in Alternate History Blog



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Madding Crowd, Part 4: The Egyptian Civil War by Chris Oakley

Summary: In the first three chapters of this series we reviewed the circumstances that led to the outbreak of civil war in Egypt in 2011, the bitter battles which raged during the conflict, and the collapse of the Mubarak regime in the war's final days. In this installment, we'll look at Hosni Mubarak's trial and execution and the post-civil war Egyptian government's struggles to rebuild the country's damaged economy.

******

It was, ironically, after their rebellion against the Mubarak regime was over that the new Egyptian government's struggles truly began. The civil war had left Egypt's economy and infrastructure in ruins and there was a great deal of work to be done in repairing them; additionally, the turmoil generated by the civil war in general and the Mubarak regime's final collapse in particular had left the country isolated from the rest of the world at a time when foreign trade was urgently needed to re-energize its finances. Last but not least, there was the question of what to with Mubarak himself. There was widespread support for putting the deposed Egyptian president on trial, but doing so was easier said than done given how the civil war had all but wiped out the Egyptian civilian court system.

     The first idea proposed for Mubarak's trial was to prosecute him at a special military tribunal, but this suggestion was quickly vetoed for many reasons-- the most significant of which was the simple truth there weren't enough experienced officers left within the ranks of the Egyptian military to make such a tribunal possible. The next proposed solution to the problem was to try Mubarak before a three-man civilian panel composed of former attorneys, but lack of manpower derailed this idea too. The problem seemed utterly insoluble, and at one point there were even rumors the new government might just throw in the towel and release Mubarak into the custody of his family, now living in exile in London.

     That prospect enraged many former rebel fighters, who saw it as letting the deposed Egyptian ruler get away with his crimes scot-free. It also aroused the fury of Egyptian civilians who'd lost family and friends in the carnage of the civil war. On September 13th, 2011 their anger was channeled into action as hundreds of people gathered at the prison where Mubarak was incarcerated to hold a protest rally calling for the former Egyptian president to be put on trial, even if it meant bringing in foreigners to administer the proceedings. What was left of the country's security forces immediately assembled a defensive cordon around the prison complex; for more than three days, the demonstrators and the security troops were locked in a tense standoff that more than once threatened to erupt into rioting.

     The standoff finally ended late on the afternoon of September 17th, when word came from a prominent Egyptian-born barrister who had emigrated to Britain that he would volunteer to return to Cairo with a group of fellow attorneys to establish a special court whose sole responsibility would be to hear the charges against Mubarak and then prosecute the former Egyptian president. True to his word, he arrived in the Egyptian capital on September 19th with ten other barristers in tow; two of these people would serve as Mubarak's defense counsel and two others act as prosecutors, while the rest of the group would make up the judge and jury. In theory it was a superb plan given the state Egypt's judiciary had fallen into by that point.

      In practice, it turned out to be a different story. Rage against Mubarak and his cronies overwhelmed the tribunal almost from the first moment of opening arguments in Mubarak's trial. At least twice in the trial's first week the chief defense counsel was physically assaulted by relatives of Mubarak's victims; the second assault inflicted a host of injuries serious enough to nearly hospitalize the defense counsel. The lone foreign journalist in attendance at the opening phase of the Mubarak tribunal said in an online post after the second assault that the atmosphere inside the courtroom was in some ways reminiscent of the mob scene that had attended the 1945 execution of Benito Mussolini.

      And that wouldn’t be the only time comparisons were drawn between the trial of the deposed Egyptian president and the demise of the Duce. During the Mubarak tribunal those symbols of the old regime that hadn’t already been blasted to pieces by artillery fire or torn down by people enraged at the regime’s abuses were vandalized or destroyed in a final burst of fury by the victims of the regime’s tyranny-- and one of those symbols just happened to be located in the courtroom where the tribunal was prosecuting Mubarak. A former Egyptian army lieutenant who had been cashiered out of the service after writing a letter to his family which mildly rebuked the government’s censorship laws burst into the court in the midst of the defense team’s cross-examination of a key prosecution witness and fired three shots into a portrait of the former president. While thankfully nobody was killed or wounded by the gunfire, the glass in the portrait frame was shattered and the portrait itself ripped to pieces. It was reminiscent, one Italian newspaper said, of the toppling of busts and defacing of posters that had accompanied Mussolini’s ouster in 1943.

      As the foreign media began returning to Cairo in greater numbers during the second phase of a trial, the world slowly discovered just how deep the hate towards Mubarak ran among his own people. Effigies of the deposed former Egyptian president were either hanged or set afire in the presence of TV cameras and protestors waved anti-Mubarak placards in the air at every opportunity. Social media became deluged with anti-Mubarak messages, videos, and tweets-- some of them almost obscene --that called for Mubarak's head(often as not literally). A technician from al Jazeera who bore a passing resemblance to Mubarak was seized and assaulted by an angry mob less than a block from the Mubarak tribunal courtroom, and had an Egyptian army patrol not intervened on his behalf to disperse the mob he might well have been lynched on the spot. As it was, he spent most of the rest of his time in Egypt sporting an eyepatch and a surgical glove; by an interesting coincidence, the technician quit his job shortly after returning from Egypt and threw away his passport.

******

    The rest of the trial went on under a cloud of tension as witnesses, judges, attorneys, and spectators waited to see what further eruptions of violence would erupt in the courtroom and cause the wheels of justice to screech to a halt. Some of the more pessimistic spirits in the upper echelons of the new Egyptian government were sure the courtroom would be attacked by suicide bombers before the verdict came in. No such attacks ever materialized, but just the same fears of a possible suicide bomber strike reflected the post-Mubarak government's concern that the internal political situation in Egypt was still dangerously unstable and could be so for weeks-- if not months –to come.

    On October 14th, 2011 the tribunal rendered its verdict to a packed courtroom. To Mubarak's dismay, the jury in the tribunal had unanimously found him guilty on all counts and sentenced him to execution by firing squad. He pleaded with his defense team to file an immediate appeal, but before they could even say a word in response a crowd of people who had lost friends or relatives to Mubarak's security forces broke through the police cordon guarding the defense and prosecution tables; they dragged a bitterly protesting Mubarak into the streets outside the courtroom and thrust him onto an improvised gallows, where they would administer what could most accurately be described as vigilante justice. As the deposed Egyptian president tried desperately to convince his captors to let him go, a crowd of onlookers mercilessly jeered Mubarak and threw everything from crumpled paper to pieces of brick in his direction.

     He was hustled onto the gallows platform like a common criminal and forced to stick his head into a noose made from rope found at the Cairo docks. Asked if he had any final words before he was to be executed, the panicked former Egyptian president reiterated his pleas to be released; in a rage, the men of the execution party kicked the gallows trap door open and watched as Mubarak's body dangled from the noose like a fish on an angling line. Those who had mobile phones or other recording devices with them hastened to capture the fallen dictator’s final breath in real time; when the first video footage of his execution was posted online it went viral within a matter of minutes. Few if any tears were shed by his fellow Egyptians over his demise-- in fact, in some parts of the country the news was greeted with outright celebration by family and friends of some of the victims of his crackdowns on political dissenters during the years before the civil war.

     In Libya, where the Khadafy regime was on its last legs, Muammar Khadafy saw an alarming and potentially fatal glimpse of his own future if he continued trying to hold on to power. Two days after Mubarak was executed Khadafy abruptly announced his resignation as Libya's head of state in a short, somewhat disjointed televised speech broadcast from the offices of the Libyan interior ministry. As soon as the broadcast ended Khadafy surrendered himself to a delgation of U.N. human rights investigators, concluding with some justification that he would likely get a better deal from the International Criminal Court than from his fellow countrymen when he stood trial for his actions during the forty- three years he had ruled Libya. Certainly in the U.N.'s hands there was far less chance of gettling lynched in the street like a common thug...

*****

     While the International Criminal Court was busy getting ready to prosecute Khadafy, another UN branch-- the World Bank --took up the job of helping to restart Egypt's war-stalled economy. In early November of 2011 the World Bank, with the full backing of the United States and many other major economic powers, extended a multi-million dollar loan to the Egyptian government for the purpose of rebuilding factories and markets devastated by the civil war; concurrent with this loan, the World Bank's top officials went on a media blitz meant to encourage foreign companies to re-invest in Egypt. Although at first it seemed as if these measures were simply sticking Band-Aids on a broken leg, eventually the Egyptian economy began turn around and the country's gross national product would increase by 20 percent over the next year.

    By the summer of 2013 foreign tourists were coming back to Egypt in numbers close to the original prewar levels and the domestic economy was regaining some its old vigor. But the surest evidence the country was on the road to full economic recovery came that autumn, when two major U.S. Internet companies announced a joint investment in a three-month project to restore e-mail service in Alexandria; that investment pumped billions of dollars into Egypt’s economy at exactly the time when that kind of an infusion was sorely needed....

 

 

comments powered by Disqus

 

TO BE CONTINUED

Sitemetre

Site Meter