Parliament demands "Off with
Catherine's Head!"
by Steve Payne
Author
says: what if Churchill had been fired from post after the Norway
Fiasco? Please note that the opinions expressed in this post do not
necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).
In 1940, on this day in
the British House of Commons the "Narvik Debate" closed with a
vote of "no confidence" that the Government of Neville
Chamberlain narrowly survived. The Prime Minister (pictured, left) was
forced to make a number of concessions. His keynote proposal to create a
new position of "Chairman of the Military Co-ordinating Committee of
the Cabinet" was scrapped. And the preferred candidate was dismissed
from his post of First Lord of the Admiralty, although he would later
accept the consolation prize of becoming the "Duke of London".
In which an impetuous politician blunders for the last
time
The Western Allies had taken the offensive after the appointment of
incoming French Prime Minister Paul Reynaud, on a limited scale, at
least. Because neutral nations had been appalled that Poland had been
left to its fate. Deciding against sending an Expeditionary Force to
Finland, and risk a declaration of war from the Soviet Union, the
Western Allies had settled on Norway as the place to make a stand.
Because vital supplies of Nazi iron passed through the port of Narvik, a
decision was made to use their superior naval forces to launch a
pre-emptive strike that would hurt the German War Effort and also score
a miliary victory for the West.
"Churchill has allowed himself to be
converted into an air-raid shelter to keep the splinters from hitting
his colleagues" ~ David Lloyd GeorgeThe attack in February
was a resounding success, achieving both an irreversible occupation of
Norway, and also a damaging blow to German supplies. In contrast, the
Baltic Sea offensive by the Royal Navy was a catastrophe of the highest
magnitude. A substantial naval squadron had been lost, comprising three
Revenge class battleships, an aircraft carrier, five cruisers, two
destroyer flotillas, submarines and supporting auxiliaries. Worse, the
battleships had required significant modification to resist air and
submarine attack. Two 15-inch gun turrets had to be removed, and an
additional two thousand tons of armour added that had to be stolen from
other pressing military applications.
"Depart, I say, and let us have done with
you. In the name of God, go!" ~ Leo Amory The architect of
"Project Catherine" was of course the hot-headed warmonger,
Winston S. Churchill (pictured, below) who foolishly anticipated that a
show of force would encourage the Scandinavian nations to join the war
against Germany. The impact of air power had been under-estimated in the
plan, and in fact this flaw had been identified by the First Sea Lord
Admiral Sir Dudley Pound during the planning phase. And yet Churchill
had ignored those concerns. Acting over-boldly as a result of the
successful capture of Narvik, Churchill had even failed to realised that
Project Catherine had become largely redundant because the iron ore
shipments had already been stopped.
 That
Churchill could be capable of such a blunder was of little surprise to
many. Throughout his long-career, he had held many of the high offices
of state, leaving all of those positions in a frightful mess. As Home
Secretary, he had personally taken charge of the Siege of Sidney Street,
a notorious gunfight in London's East End in 1911. During his first
spell as First Lord of the Admiralty, he had orchestrated the
disasterous Gallipoli Campaign which had forced his exit from the
Government (he spent the next few months seeing action on the Western
Front). And later, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, he had placed Britain
back on the Gold Standard in a misguided attempt to set the clock back
to 1914.
Terminal illness would soon end the Premiership of Chamberlain. His
successor Lord Halifax would be roundly criticised by Churchill from the
backbenchers for concluding an armistice with Germany in 1941. In
retrospect, it was an insightful decision, because not only did Britain
stand undefeated with many of its war aims achieved, but such a
settlement allowed the Nazis to focus on the extermination of Communism,
an outcome which Churchill himself had advocated during the Russian
Civil War.
Author
says, this cross-over entry explores (in reverse) some of the ideas of
the novel "The Separation" by Christopher Priest (2002).
Steve Payne
Editor of Today in
Alternate History, a Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In
History That Never Occurred Today. Follow us on Facebook
and Twitter.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit
differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items
explore that possibility. Possibilities such as America becoming a Marxist
superpower, aliens influencing human history in the 18th century and Teddy
Roosevelt winning his 3rd term as president abound in this interesting
fictional blog.

Sitemetre
|