Updated Sunday 15 May, 2011 12:18 PM

   Headlines  |  Alternate Histories  |  International Edition


Home Page

Announcements 

Alternate Histories

International Edition

List of Updates

Want to join?

Join Writer Development Section

Writer Development Member Section

Join Club ChangerS

Editorial

Chris Comments

Book Reviews

Blog

Letters To The Editor

FAQ

Links Page

Terms and Conditions

Resources

Donations

Alternate Histories

International Edition

Alison Brooks

Fiction

Essays

Other Stuff

Authors

If Baseball Integrated Early

Counter-Factual.Net

Today in Alternate History

This Day in Alternate History Blog



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norton AntiSpam – A Review

Regular readers will know that I don’t often review programs, particularly ones that have no Alternate History use at all.  Sudden Strike, for example, has many different uses for the alternate historian, so why, you might ask, have I decided to review Norton AntiSpam?

The simple fact is that the program is next to useless for me.  Now, I’m a big fan of most of Norton’s products, but this one was a big disappointment.  The main problem is that its impossible to configure it to recognise group mail and that it cannot work with hotmail.  For me, those are both big inconveniences.

For example, lets say that Fred sends me a spam message via the CTT group.  Ok, so I use NAS to define the message as spam – so all’s right?  Not quite, the program decides that the originating address for the spam is the group email address – so all messages from the CTT group are classed as spam, and therefore blocked.

Further, I use a hotmail account for most of my mail and I needed NAS for that.  No luck, it can’t handle such email accounts.  Accounts that are private or work with a POP3 server seem to work fine, but hotmail’s out.  A serious problem. 

Few other notes: When you install the program, it automatically adds the people in your default Windows address book to its whitelist.  You can add names only from the default address book.

An interesting and promising program, but not one that is of real use to me.  It might be more use to a school or an organisation that uses home email addresses. 

And why did I write this review?  Because none of the documentation mentions any of these little flaws, so I thought I better had. 

Christopher Nuttall

Hit Counter